Missouri under the rule of Pendergast: Federal power vs. State Sovereignty

In the early years of the twentieth century, Kansas City and the rest of Missouri faced a bit of a crisis situation. No, it wasn’t from the threat of outside invasion, or tyranny in Washington, but from one of our own. Tom Pendergast, who was born in St. Joseph Missouri in 1873, would become an adept Kansas City businessman who owned such companies as “Wholesale Liquor Company”, and “Ready Mix Concrete”. Through utilizing backroom deals, monopolies, crime, strong-arm tactics, and the political experience of his older brother Jim – it wasn’t long before Tom had risen through the ranks of Kansas City Power to rule as “Boss”.

However, not content with Kansas City alone, Pendergast soon sought to exert his will on State Government and beyond through the backing of such figures like Missouri Governor Lloyd C. Stark and Harry S. Truman (See note below). While Pendergast’s considerable influence would help Kansas City prosper during the Great Depression – this came at a cost of increased violence upon the streets. One such incident was the Kansas City Massacre at Union Station in 1933, in which four police officers and their prisoner, Frank Nash, was gunned down in broad daylight.

In 1934, President Roosevelt appointed local man Maurice M. Milligan (1884 – 1959) to serve as U.S. District Attorney for the Kansas City based Western District of Missouri. Mr. Milligan became active in vigorously prosecuting voter fraud in 1936, and would go on to build a case against Tom Pendergast’s political machine. Because of Milligan’s work – which centered on a $750,000 insurance payoff scam and failure to pay federal income taxes from 1927 to 1937 – Pendergast ultimately pled guilty to two charges of income tax evasion, was fined 10,000, and went to federal prison for 15 month. Mr. Milligan would later run for U.S. Senate in 1940 against Harry S. Truman, but lost.

In his book, “Missouri Waltz”, Milligan reflects that upon his appointment to the U.S. District Attorney, he wondered if the Federal Government would step in where the local and State governments feared to tread. “I did not need to be told that Kansas City’s police setup was rotten, that crime was rampant, and that vice was flourishing. Justice, or anything less than a Federal scale seemed blind or inept, or both.”

But, Milligan also notes that Missouri seemed strangely proud of Pendergast.“The stranger to the ways of the West may wonder, as he hears the recital of Pendergast’s record of vicious bossism, how the decent people of Kansas City put up with him for so many years. Why was he not curbed before he got complete control of the city? That is an academic question. One might as well say, “Why did the people of Germany put up with Hitler?” I think it can be said without exaggeration that the people of Kansas City accepted Pendergast as the visible symbol of their pragmatic philosophy of live-and-let-live. They took a certain amount of pride in him.”

So understanding that human nature is what it is, and that corrupt politicians, corporate greed, slavery, shady backroom deals, and monopolies on power will always be a struggle as long as the world continues –  can we really afford to damn state sovereignty and limited government to failure because of bad behavior? More to the point, does the Federal Government have any business getting involved in State matters if the people aren’t ready or motivated to deal with a problem like Pendergast? Because honestly. What’s easier? Dealing with problems on a corrupted state level, or a corrupted Federal?

For more information:

Maurice M. Milligan. Missouri Waltz: The Inside Story of the Pendergast Machine by the Man who Smashed it. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1948

Note: Milligan notes in his book that when Tom Pendergast died, then Vice President Harry S. Truman returned to Kansas City to attend the funeral, and was quoted as saying, “He was my friend, and I was his.” Milligan also points out that, “President Truman’s continued affiliation with the political machine Pendergast constructed, and his close personal and political association with James Pendergast, the boss’s nephew and political heir, have kept the founder’s name alive. According to newspaper reports, James Pendergast is frequently a White House guest. He swims in the White House pool, and accompanies the President on flights aboard the ‘Sacred Cow’”.

 

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Missouri under the rule of Pendergast: Federal power vs. State Sovereignty

  1. spinoza1111 says:

    Foot in Mouth award guys, because Tom Pendergast was a great argument for Federal power, now wasn’t he? In the case of Tom Pendergast, in the matter of Al Capone, in the case of Huey Long, the Constitution worked, because it’s based on balance of power, not on your fairy tale state sovereignty.

    You guys are a riot! You’re too honest and good for your own good because you present here a perfect argument for Federal supremacy!

    You believed Reagan, or, perhaps, your fathers believed Reagan when Reagan said not to believe the government. But “the government” is an abstraction. The question is what kind. The Pendergast machine, perhaps like the administration of your governor Nixon, was based on handing out favors to insiders. “State sovereignty” simply exacerbates this problem. The rightful remedy as specified by James Madison in the Federalist Papers is bringing the Federal power to bear on the abuses you see, and not to whine about “state sovereignty”, or how you are so pure and good.

    Insofar as you have been misled, you are not good, because you cannot cheat a truly honest man. You fled what you perceived as liberalism but you only see “liberalism” through a glass darkly. Nobody you personally know can afford to be a liberal, to have extra-marital affairs or run for office. So you wind up fighting TV shadows while your own best interests such as a health care system that would allow you to compete with Lockean fairness are neglected and you thereby betray your own children.

    Can you even name some great state governors? We know Presidential greatness: Washington, Lincoln and Reagan all come to mind. But has there ever been a state governor who’s also been a great man? Sam Houston? Mario Cuomo? No matter what your politics, it’s hard to declare that Rick Scott, the governor of Florida, Scott Walker, the governor of Wisconsin, or Arnold Schwarzenegger, the former governor of California, are great men.

    Most state governors become captive, faster than most Presidents, of special interests. They wind up disappointing their own constituents. Your Governor Nixon is sticking it to you because louder mouths than you exist in the unions…but at least you have a snowball’s chance of getting a union job. To get a Republican to listen to you you have to have a rich Daddy.

    Wise up. You are SO close to wisdom in this Pendergast post it’d be a pity if you did not draw the obvious conclusion from it. The Federal government needs broad powers because face it, Missouri is a lot like Kansas, Kansas is a lot like Colorado, etc. and so on making Missouri like Hawaii. We cannot afford the luxury of power mad autocrats of any ideological stripe in state governments. The Tenth Amerndment, therefore, should be treated as something of a curio. The states can have their rights such as are not reserved for the Federal government: for example, drivers licenses are probably best administered on state levels. But punishing crimes should be a Federal affair.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s