Cato Institute on Infrastructure: “A State, Local, and Private Responsibility”

missouri-flagChris Edwards, Editor at www.DownsizingGovernment.org sent us an interesting Cato study on infrastructure spending. The study discusses how federal involvement in infrastructure has many serious disadvantages, and few, if any, advantages. It also examines the worldwide trend toward privatization and PPPs for highways, bridges, airports, and much else. The United States has been a laggard on these innovations.

Says Mr. Edwards in regards to the study, β€œIt examines the worldwide trend toward privatization and PPPs for highways, bridges, airports, and much else. The United States has been a laggard on these innovations. The study also discusses the often-heard claim that our roads/bridges are ‘crumbling.’ It turns out that Federal Highway Administration data show that our highways and bridges have shown substantial and continuous improvements in quality over the last two decades.”

To view this fantastic resource, please click: β€œInfrastructure Investment: A State, Local, and Private Responsibility.”

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Cato Institute on Infrastructure: “A State, Local, and Private Responsibility”

  1. tiffany267 says:

    Reblogged this on Tiffany's Non-Blog and commented:
    While I don’t support the religious undertones of this blogger’s content, this post is excellent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s