Humanitarian Dr. Garrow and Military insider: Chinese Debt may be pushing Obama Administration towards Civil War

In a television interview between Gary Franchi of WDHN Boston and Dr. Jim Garrow (Nobel Prize Nominee), the two discuss a military insider who has expressed concern over a new litmus test being used by the Obama administration. Apparently this test is designed to gauge the ability of U.S. military officers to obey commands to fire on American citizens – particulary in regards to a scenario where a group of people would not submit or lay down their arms when ordered…

Mr. Franchi asks Dr. Garrow about his anonymous source –someone who is considered a legend in the U.S. military, but thus far wishes to remain under the radar. Why should we believe him?

Dr. Garrow replied that his contact was expressing real concern about an individual he had brought into the military as a young man – who had also risen up high in the ranks. This person explained that he was being forced to submit to this litmus test, had failed, and was forced to resign his commission. Dr. Garrow’s contact then called him and felt the message needed to go out, as it was a serious breach of the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment of the United States.

Dr. Garrow: “China very much wants America to be disarmed – in 2011 two groups from the Bank of China and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China had come into the United States to look at the resource sector and giving valuations in oil, coal and natural gas. And places like Kansas, the bread basket of America. Putting valuations on it, and looking at settlement of the debt of the United States to China. So you’re talking trillions of dollars of debt, and their mission at this point in time was to find out what values they could place on this. Obama has allowed a number of special economic zones to be set up, very like Shenzhen China, and they’re there at the invitation of Mr. Obama. But in the end, it’s a sell-out of America and American resources, because that is what China wants (in regards to our plentiful resources). “

Gary Franchi: “Let me ask you this, if the debt can never be repaid, is China concerned with the American citizens rising up and over-throwing the United States government because of the 2nd Amendment – therefore the debt would never get paid?”

Dr. Garrow: “They’re afraid that the promise made to them. that they will be allowed to have the resources (oil, gas, coal and farming ability) – that they  will be allowed to have that in exchange for payment of the debt. They’re afraid that an armed American citizenry would rise up and wouldn’t stand for it. And they don’t want a war.”

Gary Franchi: “With all the talk of gun grabs, and states stepping up to nullify federal laws like Obamacare – do you see this litmus test as a prelude to a Civil War?

Dr. Garrow: “I think the American public if they really knew what was going on, they would be preparing for a Civil War. And Obama and the Socialists in Washington are very surprised at the reaction of the American public who have gone out of their way to armor and arm themselves to an unbelievable degree. They did not think this would take place, so I believe they’re quite fearful that the American public is now even more able to rise up and toss off a government that is repressive or headed to a dictatorship.”

Humanitarian James Garrow is the founder of The Pink Pagoda Girls. He has personally made it his mission to help save little girls in China from certain death. He has rescued over 45,000 little lives and has committed to rescuing a million more over the next ten years. He was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 and continues to inspire the world with his dedication to giving. He is also the author of The Pink Pagoda.

Read more:

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Humanitarian Dr. Garrow and Military insider: Chinese Debt may be pushing Obama Administration towards Civil War

  1. spinoza1111 says:

    Even if this paranoid, childish and vicious fantasy were true, you cannot defeat the Federal government with ARs. They will only fall into the hands of people, some of whom like to kill kids and more of whom manifest serious psychiatric illness such as Alex Jones manifests.

    The result of any military confrontation between the Federal government and you Secesh is foreordained as your loss, accompanied by massive property damage and the deaths of women and children, because you don’t have the training or self-discipline to be a counterforce to the Federals.

  2. spinoza1111 says:

    Police fire on American citizens (especially African American citizens) all the time in self-defense and to defend others. A federal government may indeed fire upon citizens who are engaged in the high crime of treason.

    I realize that many right-wingers have evolved the strange opinion that the United States is unique in the world, and even amongst federations, in having no such thing as “treason” (at least until they seize power, anyway).

    But this view has no Constitutional support whatsoever. Treason is recognized as a crime against the Federal government by virtue of its being mentioned in I/6 (treason of legislators), II/4 (treason of President or VP), and III/3 (where treason is restricted to making war on the United States, something you people seem to support). Just as a police officer can use deadly force to prevent the commission of a serious crime, a military officer can and should do the same;treason, making war on the United States, is no joke.

  3. Alan Wakefield says:

    Are you born again, Mr. Spinoza1111? Born again in the Biblical sense recognizing Jesus Christ as Creator, Lord of all and Savior? If not, that would make you and your friends satan worshipers according to God’s Word in the New Testament Book of Revelation, chapter 13, verses 4 and 8: “And they worshiped the dragon (satan)…and all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (satan) whose names are not written in the Book of Life of the Lamb…” There is ONLY ONE WAY to assure your name is in that book, “Ye must be born again.” New Testament, Gospel of John, chapter 3, verse 7. You speak like a satan worshiper, Spinoza1111, supporting obama and his friends desire to remove American’s God ordained Right of Self defense. The evidence against you is pretty conclusive, Mr. Spinoza1111, and right from your own wordprocessor. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is an Inalienable Right. Inalienable is defined in the law dictionaries as that which CANNOT be given away of taken away. And yet here you are promoting and supporting the criminal blasphemy of forcing the people to give up their God-given Right of self defense. I ask you mr. Mr. Spinoza1111, does that sound like something a Christ worshiper would do, or does it sound like something a satan worshiper would do? As I wrote above, the evidence certainly sounds conclusive. Obviously, the obama crowd would not be included with the Christ worshipers; but that conclusion was abundantly evident long before mr. sotoro/obama/whatever was chosen as president by the satan worshipers that chose him. Your characterization of Citizens protecting God given Rights as Treason is a most unique definition of Treason. What else would one expect of a satan worshiper, worshiping in the chuch of the chief counterfeiter of the universe. Have I misjudged you, . Spinoza1111.
    “Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
    Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
    A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
    Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
    Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.” Gospel of Matthew, chapter 7, verses 16-20.
    Do you think I hate you, Spinoza1111? You are quite wrong. God has Ordered His followers to Love their enemies, pray for them and do good to them. What greater love, prayer and good than Truth? I have just done you more good that you can ever comprehend by doing as my God, Jesus Christ, has Commanded. Why don’t you share this Truth with your friends?

    • spinoza1111 says:

      I am not born again. I believe that Christ like Mahomet and Buddha was a great moral teacher. I believe that if you read the Sermon on the Mount, you will find that Christ was more concerned with behavior than with belief. He repeatedly attacked the Saducees and Pharisees for their belief that their following Talmudic law to the letter authorized their daily meanness in business and their dark enthusiasm for carrying out Jewish law especially when (as in the story of the woman taken in adultery) it allowed them to see naked flesh and blood.

      Why is it that Fundamentalists and the Born Again so seldom follow Christ’s central commandment which is to love one another, clothe the naked and feed the hungry? Latter day Jewish fundamentalists always foregather to stone women or shoot Palestinians: the CHRISTIANS of Palestine (whom the Jews persecute while laughing at American Christians who think the Jews are their friends) have a better track record at succoring the needy. Christ was repeatedly at pains in his story of the “Good Samaritin” and elsewhere to point out that God wants you to succor the needy BEFORE asking him if he was one of you, pure, and a Trembler before God. Christ according to the Gospel made a point on his return from the desert of cruising with a posse consisting of reformed whores and tax collectors! He turned water into wine so the party could continue!

      If to read books is to be a Friend of the Devil then I am a Friend of the Devil.

      But I will say, damn your eyes, for your twisted interpretation of Scripture got my ancestors killed in the Thirty Years War. It’s getting gays and women killed.

  4. spinoza1111 says:

    Thanks for promptly posting my responses. I have one more if that’s OK and I understand if the moderator might not want to post three responses; if not, feel free to merge these three responses.

    Jim Garrow does not appear anywhere at the Nobel site. Nobel.org maintains no list of nominees, and its “nomination data base” ends in 1956 probably because the criteria for people who may submit a nomination are quite broad, and as your use of “Nobel nominee” shows, the mere idea that someone’s been “nominated” carries with it a great deal of prestige. My (unverified) guess is that the database was canceled in 1956 given the decline in moral seriousness since that year, and that people have been frivolously nominating, not themselves (that is forbidden), but their friends and possibly even people who pay them to submit their names; all one has to be to play this rotten little game is a professor of philosophy. You could make a Small Business, that right-wing cynosure, out of selling nominations to supplement your earnings as an adjunct at East Hell Bible College.

    I am not saying that Dr Garrow was not a nominee or paid off a professor to submit his name. I believe he was a good faith nominee by his own ideological criterion. However, I believe that his accomplishments in 2009 did not warrant a peace prize whereas the actual winner’s accomplishments as of 2009 did warrant a Peace Prize because Obama had, as of that year, risked assassination (possibly by a gun fanatic) to break the white lock on the Presidency, something that in part restored international faith in my country.

    I would also like to point out that like salesmen in my own quondam business, the computer business, people in money-driven politics are forced to use micro-advantages to compete at times selling their associations, interestingly enough, with “socialistic”, international organizations that other players, sans those associations, deride until they in turn get blessed by some award from one of those organizations.

    I know a hell of a lot about art and in 1999 I showed up on time in a suit to interview for a job at the Art Institute of Chicago where, because I also had experience about technology I was the strongest candidate (this, to my recollection, was what the hiring manager told me). But I was not selected because I was “too good to be true”. In a vile culture formed and malformed by trash novels in which even in 1999, white males in nice suits were liars, my actual accomplishments, just overshot the mark and augured in a mile from the LZ.

    Cf. STIFFED by Susan Faludi. Once into very early middle age, a white male becomes quickly shop-soiled precisely at the point where he’s most economically needy, whether for his kids’ educational funds or child support and he starts to get bullied maliciously in the job market. But many white males are so invested in the “free market” and so authoritarian that they find it impossible to admit that they are being bullied (and, they are fearful of being “outed” on social media as malcontents by the boss) that right wing politics is their only safety valve.

    People in tech and elsewhere who looked forward to being “gurus” often overnight are humiliated, shown their place and mocked in meetings by sales clowns and managers who know far less as somehow, in someway, out of touch.

    Which is why in the 2000s I rather shamelessly exploited my association with John Nash. I’d actually worked with him and solved a grand total of one of his computing problems as had other members of Princeton University’s staff but the Art Institute experience had forced me to conclude that I had to mention this true fact (this truthy factoid) to “hook” the hiring manager when looking for work in the 2000s (I’d foolishly left Princeton).. My actual knowledge of how, in one European gallery at the Art Institute, one could see the effect of transition from the “brown soups” of late 18th century painting by such painters as Sir Joshua Reynolds, to the “unbearable lightness” of Corot, counted for not, just trash culture factoids reflecting the mob’s worship/fear/hatred of people like Nash. But to find work I used my truthy factoid because the low expectations of punk “hiring managers” discounted my real culture, work ethic and tech accomplishments.

    I was and remain FDR’s forgotten man, and I voted for Obama. Pundits have pointed out, after his 2012 victory, that what gave the President the critical edge was the votes of “white male losers” especially in Ohio.

    WMLs are tech people normally expected to have right of center views because IN THE PAST their skills ensured employment. This is no longer the case. I wrote a computer book (“Build Your Own .Net Language and Compiler”, Edward G. Nilges, Apress 2004): I’ve met computer authors at unemployment offices. The manager who successfully landed the Curiosity Mars rover is pounding the pavements. You might know release 1.99 cold but if you don’t know 2.0, you can’t get hired (but the “H1B” immigrant worker who knows neither gets the job).

    White Male Losers, living in their aged Mom’s basement back in Cleveland after years of this bullying, appear to have deserted the Republicans in Ohio explaining much of Obama’s victory; and we’re tired of shills like Garrow.

    I submit to you that in promoting Jim Garrow as the source for a “story” that turns out to be an unverified rumor, that is dishonestly presented on the video as a news story, you are shamefully and shamelessly turning a person who has been a true humanitarian and good person into an irresponsible liar and shill. I am glad to now collect Social Security so I NO LONGER have to compromise my honesty, my good name and the name of others to merely survive as an older person. And you can have my Social Security when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.

  5. Pingback: Obama placing fellow America-haters in the US Military « Coach is Right

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s